Charges against Dalmiya 'baseless': Bengal Sports Minister - Instablogs
Charges against Dalmiya 'baseless': Bengal Sports Minister
Desh , Shimla: Mar 26 2008
Made Popular Mar 26 2008
India :
West Bengal Sports Minister Subhas Chakraborty on Wednesday described the charges against former BCCI chief Jagmohan Dalmiya as ‘baseless and untrue’ and alleged that he was being harassed ‘unnecessarily’. “Not a single...
Read Story
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Neha No
chandigarh, India
Jagmohan Dalmiya is the one who worked hard and took Indian cricket to heights, and everytime this happens, whenever someone tries to make some improvements, people put their fingers on them only..seems like they don’t have any other thing to do..
1 Stars
I wish a CBI Probe takes place in this case and Dalmiya is exposed badly. These people do not really care about the status of the game in the country and instead enjoy the perks of the level they are assigned. He was a major cause for Ganguly to sit out of the side for a couple of years. He even put in efforts to make sure that the Bengal Cricket Association does not push ahead Dada’s Case despite his superlative performances in the Duleep Trophy.

If the Bengal Sports minister is supporting him that openly...there should be a secret probe into his bank accounts as well. I bet you on this one, that even he is involved somewhere.
1 Stars
Mandira S
Hyderabad, India
I do not totally blame Dalmia.Why do people fight to become President of BCCI??? Simple answer - to make enormous money, as BCCI coffers are overflowing. And Why did Shard Pawar want to fight for this position ?
1 Stars
I missed out on that one Mandira. Well Written, Pawar to would enjoy this position and hog loads of dough before vacating the seat. There has to be a way out where all these personal bank accounts are always under check plus the board itself should define the private and official expenses thoroughly.
Add your Comment